Sunday, July 30, 2006
Your Host: Jim Chen | |
I am an expert on law, economics, and regulation. For more information, please visit my home page or download my résumé. For scholarly details, please visit my SSRN page or my Google Scholar page, or download my academic curriculum vitae. I also welcome your e-mail. |
- Guests
- Frank Pasquale ssrn
- Andrea Matwyshyn ssrn
Jurisdynamic Essentials
- Jurisdynamics' Building Blocks
- Reading Lists
High reliability organizations
Statutory interpretation - Constitutional Curiosities
The scavenger hunt
The answer key - Hierarchies of Legal Scholarship
J.B. Ruhl (part I)
Jim Chen
J.B. Ruhl (part II) - Other Notable Posts
Alas, Babel
Born in the U.S.A.
The law of love and gravity
Honoring Norman Borlaug
Hall of Idols
Recent Posts
- Felis silvestris catus
- Law AND Complex Adaptive Systems vs. Law AS a Comp...
- Designing Institutions for a Complex World
- Complexity theory and high reliability organizatio...
- Is There a There There?
- Is Complexity Theory More than a Metaphor for Law?
- Complexity Theory in Legal Scholarship
- Fire and ice
- Technological announcements
- Fractal Inequality and Econo-Pandas
Subscribe to Jurisdynamics
Subscribe to Jurisdynamics by e-mail
Supreme Court/FindLaw search
Search FindLaw's database of Supreme Court decisions since 1893 (U.S. Reports, volumes 150-present). Browsable by U.S. Reports volume number and by year. Searchable by citation, case title, and full text.
Browsing
Supreme Court decisions: by volume, by year
Citation Search
Title Search
Full-Text Search
Web 2.0 calculator
Lijit search
The Jurisdynamics bookshelf
- Daniel A. Farber, Jim Chen, Robert R.M. Verchick & Lisa Grow Sun, Disaster Law and Policy (2d edition)
- Daniel A. Farber & Jim Chen, Disasters and the Law: Katrina and Beyond
1 Comments:
Hmm; seems to me that Ann is "flabbergast[ed]" because she might be missing the facetiousness in Glenn's post.
Glenn wrote, "SOME THOUGHTS ON ACADEMIC BLOGGING from me and from some other academic bloggers, in the Chronicle of Higher Education. I'm sorry to see some people say that their Deans don't appreciate blogging -- my Dean has been very encouraging, and in fact says that he thinks it counts as scholarship, which surely makes me -- on a word-count basis, at least -- one of the most productive scholars around. . . ."
So there are two possible theories here: (1) Glenn is seriously saying something pretty ridiculous and self-aggrandizing. (2) Glenn is making a joke based on the very ridiculousness of trying to seriously count blogging as scholarship. Which is right?
Well, if you follow Glenn's link to his "some thoughts" on the matter, one finds this in Glenn's contribution: "My own feeling is that blogging is like most hobbies -- something that should be peripheral to hiring and tenure decisions." Glenn is writing specifically about hiring and tenure denials based on blogging, but his underlying point seems to suggest that he doesn't really think that blogging should count as scholarship, no? Seems to me that Ann is body-slamming a straw man here (unless there's a deep joke in Ann's post as well that I can't find).
Post a Comment
<< Home